This is the text extract for Comparison of eligible patient pool and treatment regimen 12 months sequential treatment , browse documents here.
Comparison of eligible patient pool and treatment regimen
12 months sequential treatment
Eligible patient population
9 weeks concurrent treatment
Eligible patients were those presenting with HER-2 positive early breast cancer, with acceptable heart function (assumes some patients excluded from treatment for inadequate heart function). The weight of patients (and correspondingly, the dose per patient) was calculated using the appropriate distributions as per the age and weight distributions for HER 2 positive early breast cancer patients in New Zealand.
Patient Numbers Regimen
Year 1: 2801 Year 5: 339 1 loading dose (8mg/kg) trastuzumab, then 6mg/kg every 3 weeks for one year following completion of standard chemotherapy. Total of 17 infusions (each requiring an extra visit to the hospital).
Year1: 3402 Year 5: 413 9 trastuzumab infusions at 1 week intervals. Loading dose 4mg/kg, remaining doses 2mg/kg. If administered as per the FinHer protocol, total of 9 infusions (up to 6 more visits than standard chemotherapy in node positive patients)3.
1
Note that these are revised patient numbers from the initial budget impact analysis. PHARMAC staff now estimate that a further 15-20% of HER2 positive patients eligible for treatment would be excluded following anthracycline treatment, and therefore up to 15-20% less patients than initially calculated would not receive trastuzumab in clinical practice under the sequential regimen (note that this also means that 15-20% less patients would potentially benefit from trastuzumab).
2
Note that more patients are eligible for treatment under the 9 week regimen because this allows treatment with trastuzumab before patients receive their cardiotoxic anthracycline chemotherapy (Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE). Trastuzumab in early stage breast cancer. KCE reports vol. 34C, 2006. http://kce.fgov.be/index_en.aspx?ID=0&SGREF=5211&CREF=7198)
3
An alternative dosing regimen is 3 trastuzumab infusions at 3 week intervals, loading dose 8mg/kg, remaining doses 6mg/kg. Total of 3 infusions (no extra visits compared with standard chemotherapy).
Comparison of Annual Drug Cost and Impact on DHB services
Total dose Drug cost per patient ($NZ) Trastuzumab Docetaxel Total drug cost Approximate DHB services costs Total Cost Description of costs 12 months sequential treatment 104mg/kg $71,000 n/a ~$20 million $5 million 9 weeks concurrent treatment 20mg/kg $13,000 ~$7,000 $5 million $700,000
~$25 million per annum ~$6 million per annum DHB services costs include the costs of compounding, administration (infusion and monitoring costs) and cardiac monitoring. Patients who experienced an adverse event that lead to treatment discontinuation were assumed to accrue the costs of drug up until the time of drug discontinuation (drop out rates were as per the drop outs reported in the HERA trial). This does not include costs incurred for treating patients who experience cardiac adverse events (however, this is included in the cost-utility analysis). In addition, this does not include the cost offsets anticipated from reduced disease recurrence (however, these are included in the CUA and this information is documented in TAR 75).
Cost- effectiveness comparison
The cost-utility analysis for 12 months of trastuzumab given after chemotherapy had a base-case result of about $75,000 per QALY4. However, this analysis showed a large range of plausible outcomes, largely due to the uncertainty surrounding duration of benefit and untreated disease progression. None of the plausible outcomes gave sufficient confidence that 12 months of trastuzumab treatment would be a cost-effective use of health funds compared with other investments. PHARMAC has estimated the revised cost-utility analysis of a nine-week concurrent regimen to be, under fairly conservative assumptions, less than $20,000 per QALY (or 50 QALYs per million spent). At less than $20,000 per QALY, trastuzumab would be as, or more, cost-effective than many other medicines PHARMAC has funded. The nine week concurrent regimen is likely to be four times more cost-effective than the 12 month sequential regimen (50 QALYs per million for 9 weeks, 12.5 QALYs per million spent for 12 months).
4
A QALY stands for a Quality adjusted life year. A QALY considers how treatment affects patient quality of life and quantity of life. The cost/QALY is a standard measure used to compare medicines for cost-effectiveness, with a lower cost per QALY being more cost-effective.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of eligible patient pool and treatment regimen 12 months sequential treatment
Abstract
Eligible patient population 9 weeks concurrent treatment Eligible patients were those presenting with HER-2 positive early breast cancer, with acceptable heart function (assumes some patients excluded from treatment…
Page 1
Note
This text has been extracted from the source PDF document.
Also available as plain text.
Please contact webmaster to discuss alternative format options.